Redefining the E-waste Management Framework at the University of Leeds: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainability
Author: Kaila Maxine Cristi, Nishant Tyagi
Department: School of Biology, University of Leeds
Publication Date: 05-11-2024
Conference Location: University of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK and online
Theme: Protecting nature and the natural environment
Keywords: circular economy, obsolescence, e-waste awareness, inventory management, institutional responsibility, sustainable framework.
Name of Conference: Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS)
Conference Date: 29 Aug 2023 - 31 Aug 2023
Contribution: Decarbonisation or Demise - Sustainable Solutions for Resilient Communities
Conference URL:
https://international-seeds.co.uk/Seeds1/index.php
Abstract: The rising gap between the amount of e-waste being produced and recycled is one of the major environmental concerns facing the world today. The UK stands second internationally in terms of the e-waste generated per capita. The dependence on electronics has increased, especially in institutions of higher learning, due to the expanding digitalisation of education (e.g., e-learning). Additionally, the sheer volume of research necessitates using cutting-edge electronics, while the frequent hardware/software upgrades result in a high rate of obsolescence. Despite being major e-waste producers, the universities typically lack the capability to ensure that their end-of-life equipment is handled sustainably. Thus, effective e-waste management at the university level is vital for achieving a circular economy. This study aims to critically evaluate the policies and practices concerning e-waste generation, handling, and disposal at the University of Leeds. Based on a literature review, a set of open-ended questions was formulated. Next, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the University staff. The discussions attempted to gauge the level of e-waste awareness and evaluate the effectiveness of current practices. Finally, the anonymised data was qualitatively and quantitatively analysed to identify recurring experiences and opinions. The results highlight several challenges, which include, inter alia, lack of time and capacity with the staff, diversity of electronic lab equipment across faculties and absence of a pan-University e-waste management unit. In addition, various drivers for sustainable e-waste management at the University are identified, such as better information dissemination, managing inventory of e-waste, and institutionalising responsibility for e-waste. In conclusion, the study explores e-waste at the level of universities in an effort to bridge a significant research gap. It formulates a comprehensive framework to manage e-waste based on the best practices collated from universities across the globe, tailors it to the University\'s needs, and provides recommendations for e-waste monitoring.
References:
- Agamuthu, P., Kasapo, P., & Mohd Nordin, N. A. (2015). E-waste flow among selected institutions of higher learning using material flow analysis model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105, 177–185.
- Arain, A. L., Pummill, R., Adu-Brimpong, J., Becker, S., Green, M., Ilardi, M., Van Dam, E., & Neitzel, R. L. (2020). Analysis of e-waste recycling behavior based on survey at a Midwestern US University. Waste Management, 105, 119–127.
- Chibunna, J. B., Siwar, C., Begum, R. A., & Mohamed, A. F. (2012). The challenges of e-waste management among institutions: A case study of UKM. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 644–649.
- Choy, L. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complementary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19, 99–104.
- Dayaday, M. G., & Galleto Jr., F. A. (2022). Electronic waste (E-Waste) management of higher education institutions in South Central Mindanao, Philippines. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 20(5), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/20/202200053
- Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union, L 150.
- Forti, V., Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., & Bel, G. (2020). The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential.
- Ivo Fon, M. (2018). Disposal of e-waste. Case study: University of Bamenda.
- University of Kansas. (2023). e-Waste recycling. [Online]. Retrieved from https://technology.ku.edu/catalog/e-waste-recycling
- Griffith University Library. (2021). Recycle at the library! [Online]. [Accessed June]. Retrieved from https://blogs.griffith.edu.au/library/2021/05/18/recycle-at-the-library/
- Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9).
- Saldaña, C., & Messina, S. (2021). E-waste recycling assessment at university campus: A strategy toward sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23.
- Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Procedure. (2020).
- IT Services. Clusters. [Online]. Retrieved from https://it.leeds.ac.uk/it?id=clusters
- Solving the E-waste Problem (Step) White Paper: One Global Definition of E-waste. (2014).
- IT Exec Team. (2022). IT update | Your questions answered. [Online]. Retrieved from https://forstaff.leeds.ac.uk/news/article/7821/it_update_your_questions_answered?notags=true
- University of Leeds Communications and Engagement Team. Display screens. [Online]. Retrieved from https://comms.leeds.ac.uk/resources/display-screens/
- Griffith University. (2023). Staff printing changes. [Online]. [Accessed June]. Retrieved from https://www.griffith.edu.au/printing/staff-printing#mfd
- WEEE2 – Definition and understanding of the 6 categories. (2018).
- Woidasky, J., & Cetinkaya, E. (2021). Use pattern relevance for laptop repair and product lifetime. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125425.
Download Manuscript